Graduates have little work history. Our assessment shows how they do real tasks from your role.
Alder & Grey is an example employer. Assessment length is set for each role, from about 5 minutes.
Graduates have no track record, so CVs look alike. Applications rise every cycle as AI auto-apply spreads, and the best candidates hold several offers.
Illustration: people who do not fit opt out before interview, so fewer drop out or renege before they start.
of entry-level hires have left a role because it did not meet their expectations.
of candidates prefer assessments that show them what to expect in the role.
of 18 to 24 year olds rate job-relevant tests the most accurate and the fairest.
Situations from your workplace. Choose what you would do.
Prioritise, check, match, type, as the job demands.
Only where the role needs them, such as knowing the role itself.
Right to work, shifts, location and licences, checked first.
The hard parts shown honestly, so people can opt out.
Behaviours you already hire for, tested in real situations.
Signal, our online job analysis survey, asks people in the role what they do and what it takes. That sets what we measure and the context of the assessment.
Your hiring committee confirms the attributes and agrees which matter most. That sets the scoring.
Our trained occupational psychologists write each question around a real situation or task. Your committee approves the questions and the scoring.
Integrate with your ATS so candidates are invited automatically, work in our dashboard, or plug into your current workflow.
Every candidate gets a score you can explain. Every report runs an AI detection check. Flagged candidates go to your team for review, never auto-rejected.
We compare your hiring decisions with the scores. Here, hired candidates scored highest, and Attention to Detail best predicted who was hired, so its weighting rises from 15% to 22%.
Candidates check they are eligible and see an honest preview of the job. Then they answer realistic scenarios and job tasks. Some decide the job is not for them and step aside.
A ranked list of candidates, and a report for each one that explains the score. Every report runs an AI detection check.
We compare your hiring decisions with the scores, then improve the questions and weightings. See “How we keep proving it works”.
12-month retention, up from 62%
6-month retention, up from 87%
of apprentices are women, nearly 3x the industry average
less time spent reviewing applications by hand
of final-stage candidates from racially or ethnically diverse backgrounds
positive candidate rating
chose to opt out after seeing the role, with 87.4% completion
It is all we build, for frontline and early careers hiring.
1M+ assessments, 99.9% uptime, multi-language and multi-market.
You see what is measured, why, and how each score is made. No black boxes.
You work with senior experts and the founders. Changes take days, not months.
An unlimited-use subscription based on your hiring volume, never per candidate. The first assessment is designed at cost.
A session with your wider hiring stakeholders.
We map one role and show how the assessment fits your process.
A next step is usually an in-depth discussion to calculate the projected ROI, and a product demo to stakeholders.
Book a session →